205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.83%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 24.65%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.43%
Less D&A growth vs. MPWR's 8.53%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
1300.00%
Some yoy growth while MPWR is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-27.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MPWR at -1.73%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
336.76%
Well above MPWR's 145.33% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-785.71%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MPWR at -135.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-132.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -1373.20%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
305.88%
Lower AP growth vs. MPWR's 2487.95%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
339.29%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MPWR's 5632.71%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
108.77%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MPWR's 325.77%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
14.47%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 21.51%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-25.91%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 50.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
25.91%
Acquisition growth of 25.91% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
13.27%
Some yoy expansion while MPWR is negative at -83.61%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-46.44%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 28.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-34.57%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 169.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-796.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -25.36%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.89%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. MPWR's 111.58%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
4.79%
Buyback growth of 4.79% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.