205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.81%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 5.67%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-15.81%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 7.71%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-133.33%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-129.19%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -1092.87%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
22.58%
AR growth while MPWR is negative at -977.92%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-261.54%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -67.11%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-254.29%
Both negative yoy AP, with MPWR at -83.21%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-49.25%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -127.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
40.00%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -121.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-2.92%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MPWR at -76.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-163.79%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 9.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-86.01%
Negative yoy acquisition while MPWR stands at 103.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-118.37%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 58.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
105.93%
We have some liquidation growth while MPWR is negative at -39.17%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
94.86%
We have some outflow growth while MPWR is negative at -211.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-152.15%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 54.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
63.21%
Debt repayment growth of 63.21% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-30.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -52.76%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-2.16%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.