PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.95%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 9.49%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.47%
Less D&A growth vs. MPWR's 9.52%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
75.00%
Well above MPWR's 89.91% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
48.00%
SBC growth well above MPWR's 27.61%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-572.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MPWR is 69.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-95.83%
AR is negative yoy while MPWR is 37.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-219.15%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -0.86%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
120.37%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -244.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-181.37%
Negative yoy usage while MPWR is 833.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-500.00%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 1079.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.04%
Negative yoy CFO while MPWR is 280.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
65.44%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -52.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-97.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-7.87%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 60.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
2.44%
Below 50% of MPWR's 68.38%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
50.00%
We have some outflow growth while MPWR is negative at -21.60%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
25.17%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MPWR's 70.78%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
9.62%
Stock issuance far above MPWR's 6.57%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-314.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -40.34%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.