PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.95%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MPWR at -7.80%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.84%
Less D&A growth vs. MPWR's 13.94%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
95.38%
Well above MPWR's 94.82% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
67.74%
SBC growth well above MPWR's 4.93%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-9488.89%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MPWR is 166.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-87.59%
AR is negative yoy while MPWR is 94.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-50.42%
Negative yoy inventory while MPWR is 132.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-464.71%
Negative yoy AP while MPWR is 94.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-236.97%
Negative yoy usage while MPWR is 5425.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1.59%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -73.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-43.19%
Negative yoy CFO while MPWR is 319.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-1.55%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 31.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.30%
Some yoy expansion while MPWR is negative at -172.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
10.30%
Below 50% of MPWR's 546.50%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
81.82%
Growth well above MPWR's 83.64%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
102.73%
Investing outflow well above MPWR's 124.54%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-274.84%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
70.00%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. MPWR's 378.48%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
87.85%
Buyback growth of 87.85% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.