205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.82%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -9.38%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.76%
Some D&A expansion while MPWR is negative at -0.34%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-550.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 41.80%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.73%
SBC growth well above MPWR's 2.66%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
40.90%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -181.33%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-538.89%
AR is negative yoy while MPWR is 1069.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
16.95%
Some inventory rise while MPWR is negative at -76.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
159.68%
Lower AP growth vs. MPWR's 1637.84%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
71.68%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -266.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-177.42%
Both negative yoy, with MPWR at -81.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
20.60%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -58.78%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-47.25%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 11.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 36.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-23.87%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MPWR at -47.93%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
1150.00%
Growth well above MPWR's 25.49%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-8617.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -197.86%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
64.21%
Debt repayment growth of 64.21% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-23.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -99.92%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
23.30%
Buyback growth of 23.30% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.