205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MPWR at -4.50%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.42%
Some D&A expansion while MPWR is negative at -19.33%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
49.29%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MPWR's 104.90%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
55.88%
SBC growth well above MPWR's 11.72%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-227.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MPWR is 477.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-38.62%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MPWR at -343.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
7.69%
Some inventory rise while MPWR is negative at -185.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-670.00%
Negative yoy AP while MPWR is 1796.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-261.98%
Negative yoy usage while MPWR is 6759.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1650.00%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 606.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-47.14%
Negative yoy CFO while MPWR is 61.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-8.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -15.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
6500.00%
Acquisition growth of 6500.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-89.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -306.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-22.87%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 6.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-566.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 72.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-970.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -883.11%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-57.09%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
44.44%
Issuance growth of 44.44% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
95.38%
We have some buyback growth while MPWR is negative at -8.95%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.