205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.07%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 903.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
8.21%
D&A growth well above MPWR's 6.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
36.36%
Some yoy growth while MPWR is negative at -166735.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-10.34%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 8.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
738.30%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -226.33%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
194.70%
AR growth well above MPWR's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-21.58%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
569.23%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -256.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
7.12%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -191.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
103.13%
Well above MPWR's 64.95%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
15.36%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -27.63%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
9.42%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -91.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.73%
Purchases well above MPWR's 59.85%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 102.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
10542.31%
We have some outflow growth while MPWR is negative at -568.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
226.08%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MPWR's 2039.97%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
90.85%
Debt repayment growth of 90.85% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-25.64%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-68.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -11141.13%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.