205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.16%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MPWR at -90.77%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.53%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 14.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-314.29%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 100.65%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
48.72%
SBC growth while MPWR is negative at -97.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-341.33%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MPWR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-198.60%
AR is negative yoy while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
30.74%
Inventory growth of 30.74% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-239.08%
Negative yoy AP while MPWR is 201.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-200.33%
Negative yoy usage while MPWR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-6000.00%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 2837.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-57.51%
Negative yoy CFO while MPWR is 52.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
5.79%
Lower CapEx growth vs. MPWR's 37.75%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.82%
Some yoy expansion while MPWR is negative at -153.18%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.34%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MPWR's 81.10%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
104.07%
We have mild expansions while MPWR is negative at -149.60%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-150.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
35.63%
Issuance growth of 35.63% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-21.60%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 100.86%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.