205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
200.23%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -11.14%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
244.49%
Well above MRVL's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-3480.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MRVL at -279.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
98.50%
Inventory growth well above MRVL's 58.83%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
716.67%
Growth well above MRVL's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-526.36%
Both negative yoy, with MRVL at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
59.20%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -35.23%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
13.73%
Some CapEx rise while MRVL is negative at -71.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.77%
Negative yoy purchasing while MRVL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
75.53%
Liquidation growth of 75.53% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.89%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -33.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
50.00%
We have some buyback growth while MRVL is negative at -70.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.