PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-8.06%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MRVL at -11.14%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Well above MRVL's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth while MRVL is negative at -279.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above MRVL's 58.83%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above MRVL's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-107.78%
Both negative yoy, with MRVL at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
34.22%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -35.23%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-63.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -71.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.10%
Purchases growth of 32.10% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
5.39%
Liquidation growth of 5.39% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-32.70%
We reduce yoy other investing while MRVL is 6275.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
26.41%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -33.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.42%
We slightly raise equity while MRVL is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
35.29%
We have some buyback growth while MRVL is negative at -70.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.