PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.42%
Net income growth under 50% of MRVL's 69.85%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.87%
D&A growth well above MRVL's 3.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
46.15%
Deferred tax of 46.15% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.32%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -228.06%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-28.26%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MRVL at -1820.03%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
237.84%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -28.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-219.05%
Negative yoy while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
92.86%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -78.80%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-22.73%
Negative yoy CapEx while MRVL is 46.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -17.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-18.70%
We reduce yoy sales while MRVL is 31.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8900.00%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 34.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
193.75%
We slightly raise equity while MRVL is negative at -40.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-27.08%
We cut yoy buybacks while MRVL is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.