205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-28.46%
Negative net income growth while MRVL stands at 117.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-6.14%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MRVL at -47.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-109.77%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-276.09%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MRVL is 182.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1590.91%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MRVL at -178.69%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.80%
Negative yoy usage while MRVL is 180.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
100.00%
Well above MRVL's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-63.17%
Negative yoy CFO while MRVL is 131.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-46.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -19.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.95%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MRVL's 90.86%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-22.49%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MRVL at -87.20%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
131.82%
Growth well above MRVL's 69.96%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-271.30%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 59.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -58.40%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-49.57%
We cut yoy buybacks while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.