205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.58%
Negative net income growth while MRVL stands at 88.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.96%
D&A growth well above MRVL's 0.81%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-1014.29%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
167.37%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -83.92%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
204.11%
Some inventory rise while MRVL is negative at -2.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.55%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -231.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
980.00%
Well above MRVL's 387.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
102.70%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of MRVL's 137.99%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
27.04%
CapEx growth well above MRVL's 36.48%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.03%
We reduce yoy sales while MRVL is 67.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
34.25%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -138.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.29%
Negative yoy issuance while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
0.92%
Buyback growth of 0.92% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.