PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
106.92%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -0.59%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.72%
Negative yoy D&A while MRVL is 1.48%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
1083.33%
Deferred tax of 1083.33% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-2.13%
Negative yoy SBC while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-68.42%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MRVL is 1466.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-60.34%
AR is negative yoy while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-243.24%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MRVL at -115.77%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.00%
Growth well above MRVL's 326.42%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-160.00%
Both negative yoy, with MRVL at -15.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
49.73%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 41.33%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-370.83%
Negative yoy CapEx while MRVL is 17.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-154.05%
Negative yoy purchasing while MRVL stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-73.59%
We reduce yoy sales while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-769.01%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 49.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.95%
We slightly raise equity while MRVL is negative at -74.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-0.40%
We cut yoy buybacks while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.