PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.75%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -191.63%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.62%
Negative yoy D&A while MRVL is 17.77%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-7.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-6.52%
Negative yoy SBC while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
56.25%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -16.56%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
183.87%
AR growth of 183.87% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-62.26%
Negative yoy inventory while MRVL is 515.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-140.58%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MRVL at -55.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
255.56%
Some yoy increase while MRVL is negative at -28.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
20.02%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -57.77%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-92.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -16.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.01%
Purchases growth of 5.01% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
300.00%
We have some liquidation growth while MRVL is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.47%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -147.59%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.76%
We slightly raise equity while MRVL is negative at -4.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-40.24%
We cut yoy buybacks while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.