PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.57%
Negative net income growth while MRVL stands at 16.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.04%
Some yoy growth while MRVL is negative at -245.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
75.47%
SBC growth while MRVL is negative at -3.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
173.20%
Well above MRVL's 65.76% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
121.57%
AR growth well above MRVL's 154.16%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
126.19%
Inventory growth well above MRVL's 137.90%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
260.95%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MRVL's 1184.63%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-105.88%
Negative yoy while MRVL is 38.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
80.35%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MRVL's 15.24%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
30.07%
Some CapEx rise while MRVL is negative at -8.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.13%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MRVL's 40.17%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
199.82%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MRVL's 66.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-762.87%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 96.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
65.68%
We repay more while MRVL is negative at -2.08%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-81.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -45.91%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
0.44%
Buyback growth of 0.44% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.