205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-50.42%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MRVL at -12.86%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
46.90%
Some D&A expansion while MRVL is negative at -14.93%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-1933.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 310.76%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-29.03%
Negative yoy SBC while MRVL is 5.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
98.12%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -228.51%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
972.73%
AR growth while MRVL is negative at -62.38%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
822.73%
Some inventory rise while MRVL is negative at -243.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MRVL at -151.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-3600.00%
Both negative yoy, with MRVL at -156.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-14.67%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MRVL at -31.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
20.73%
Some CapEx rise while MRVL is negative at -25.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.61%
Negative yoy purchasing while MRVL stands at 23.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-76.77%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MRVL at -39.81%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
100.00%
Growth well above MRVL's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
78.76%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -650.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
83.33%
We repay more while MRVL is negative at -2.04%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
284.85%
Stock issuance far above MRVL's 297.07%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
33.33%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of MRVL's 55.62%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.