205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
68.30%
Net income growth above 1.5x MRVL's 31.00%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-0.61%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MRVL at -12.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
625.00%
Some yoy growth while MRVL is negative at -11308700.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-7.25%
Negative yoy SBC while MRVL is 10.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-10.48%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MRVL is 109.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-339.68%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MRVL at -41.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
64.84%
Inventory growth well above MRVL's 56.89%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-251.35%
Negative yoy AP while MRVL is 332.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
155.86%
Growth well above MRVL's 64.59%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.33%
Operating cash flow growth similar to MRVL's 48.70%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-41.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -40.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above MRVL's 97.37%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-70.78%
Negative yoy purchasing while MRVL stands at 31.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
43.18%
At 75-90% of MRVL's 49.89%. Bill Ackman would push for additional sales if those assets are non-strategic or have peaked in value.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
18.89%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MRVL's 81.11%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-91.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MRVL is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-73.75%
Negative yoy issuance while MRVL is 601.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.