PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
75.78%
Net income growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.42%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
466.67%
Well above MRVL's 100.93% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-221.88%
Negative yoy SBC while MRVL is 0.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
110.78%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -91.08%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
111.92%
AR growth while MRVL is negative at -330.08%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
215.63%
Inventory growth well above MRVL's 152.57%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
3.85%
A yoy AP increase while MRVL is negative at -122.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
17.28%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MRVL's 788.31%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-48.98%
Both negative yoy, with MRVL at -99.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
78.07%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -0.69%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-2.74%
Negative yoy CapEx while MRVL is 19.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-257.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while MRVL stands at 4.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-78.12%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MRVL at -1.56%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-548.91%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 19.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
13.04%
Debt repayment growth of 13.04% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-7.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -58.51%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.