205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
82.32%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -1.55%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.24%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MRVL at -3.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-460.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 92.68%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.08%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -31.69%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-42.86%
AR is negative yoy while MRVL is 362.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-135.09%
Negative yoy inventory while MRVL is 3796.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
85.25%
A yoy AP increase while MRVL is negative at -70.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
9.62%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -153.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-50.00%
Both negative yoy, with MRVL at -21.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
87.22%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -4.77%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-15.48%
Negative yoy CapEx while MRVL is 27.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-248.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while MRVL stands at 47.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
264.42%
We have some liquidation growth while MRVL is negative at -42.28%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-638.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -115.50%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
1309.09%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -26.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.45%
Negative yoy issuance while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-6.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -12.18%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.