PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.48%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MRVL at -6.71%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.95%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MRVL at -10.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-95.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 99.37%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
30.00%
SBC growth while MRVL is negative at -21.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-265.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MRVL is 190.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-169.06%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MRVL at -580.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-81.82%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MRVL at -109.62%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-460.00%
Negative yoy AP while MRVL is 196.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-400.00%
Negative yoy usage while MRVL is 249.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
96.35%
Some yoy increase while MRVL is negative at -32.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-52.12%
Negative yoy CFO while MRVL is 133.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
1.60%
Some CapEx rise while MRVL is negative at -42.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -106.99%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
64.25%
Some yoy expansion while MRVL is negative at -24.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
29.47%
1.25-1.5x MRVL's 21.92%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
103.45%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -234.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
132.18%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -233.81%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
75.71%
Issuance growth of 75.71% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
4.01%
We have some buyback growth while MRVL is negative at -5111.59%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.