205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
297.09%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 233.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
2.23%
Some D&A expansion while MRVL is negative at -23.86%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-119.50%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
55.56%
SBC growth while MRVL is negative at -0.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-141.72%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MRVL at -97.44%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-158.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MRVL at -181.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-97.96%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MRVL at -162.79%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-172.86%
Negative yoy AP while MRVL is 181.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-118.17%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MRVL at -95.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-282.14%
Both negative yoy, with MRVL at -755.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-42.35%
Negative yoy CFO while MRVL is 13.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
18.18%
Some CapEx rise while MRVL is negative at -28.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MRVL stands at 8996.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
31.31%
Some yoy expansion while MRVL is negative at -23.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
84.18%
We have some liquidation growth while MRVL is negative at -13.94%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
98.32%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -85.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
129.62%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -141.37%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
9.88%
Issuance growth of 9.88% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-23.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -33.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.