PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.86%
Net income growth under 50% of MRVL's 55.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.75%
Some D&A expansion while MRVL is negative at -1.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
103.23%
Well above MRVL's 118.08% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
5.71%
SBC growth while MRVL is negative at -6.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
132.91%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -2891.35%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
44.89%
AR growth well above MRVL's 33.14%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
40.21%
Inventory growth well above MRVL's 72.54%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
111.76%
A yoy AP increase while MRVL is negative at -187.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
306.80%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -648.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
17.65%
Some yoy increase while MRVL is negative at -371.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
64.21%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -25.08%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-31.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while MRVL is 58.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while MRVL stands at 7.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-5.50%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MRVL at -15.12%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-5975.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -205.68%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-130.45%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 30.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
Negative yoy issuance while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-16.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -33.06%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.