PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.74%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -6.83%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
4.29%
D&A growth well above MRVL's 4.42%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-5300.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-37.84%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MRVL at -15.83%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
94.19%
Well above MRVL's 129.28% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
64.95%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. MRVL's 138.37%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
55.17%
Inventory growth well above MRVL's 58.14%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
750.00%
AP growth well above MRVL's 158.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
1.97%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MRVL's 99.37%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
95.24%
Well above MRVL's 101.61%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
15.33%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MRVL's 113.52%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-48.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -206.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
48.59%
Some acquisitions while MRVL is negative at -86.25%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-155.48%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -47.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
24.73%
Below 50% of MRVL's 88.98%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-58.02%
We reduce yoy other investing while MRVL is 1322.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-2082.72%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 828.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-46.08%
Negative yoy issuance while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-17.88%
We cut yoy buybacks while MRVL is 36.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.