PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.08%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MRVL at -68.33%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.47%
Some D&A expansion while MRVL is negative at -5.27%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
55.77%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MRVL's 243142.86%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-8.70%
Negative yoy SBC while MRVL is 13.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
104.98%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -24.14%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1211.76%
AR growth well above MRVL's 1435.36%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-288.46%
Negative yoy inventory while MRVL is 392.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-125.49%
Both negative yoy AP, with MRVL at -327.68%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
13.87%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -24936.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
1150.00%
Some yoy increase while MRVL is negative at -714.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
1.85%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -44.61%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.70%
Some CapEx rise while MRVL is negative at -3.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-12.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -78.19%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
89.25%
Purchases well above MRVL's 36.07%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
26.12%
We have some liquidation growth while MRVL is negative at -42.33%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
15.36%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -90.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
185.12%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -125.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.91%
Negative yoy issuance while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-67.42%
We cut yoy buybacks while MRVL is 99.35%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.