PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.20%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -895.49%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.00%
Less D&A growth vs. MRVL's 123.84%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-112.90%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 71.85%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-28.36%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MRVL at -15.41%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
24.31%
Less working capital growth vs. MRVL's 207.35%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
266.67%
AR growth while MRVL is negative at -707.37%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-25.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MRVL at -219.61%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
211.54%
AP growth well above MRVL's 250.06%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-40.30%
Negative yoy usage while MRVL is 218.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
141.82%
Well above MRVL's 235.99%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
10.91%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MRVL's 383.40%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
47.54%
Some CapEx rise while MRVL is negative at -3.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-47.54%
Negative yoy acquisition while MRVL stands at 99.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-312.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while MRVL stands at 761.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
10.00%
We have some liquidation growth while MRVL is negative at -96.37%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
32.42%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -4497.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-254.26%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 99.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.88%
We slightly raise equity while MRVL is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
47.16%
We have some buyback growth while MRVL is negative at -102.85%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.