PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.17%
Net income growth under 50% of MRVL's 77.38%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
9.17%
D&A growth well above MRVL's 2.32%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
78.57%
Well above MRVL's 44.89% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-20.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MRVL is 4.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
126.17%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -38.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
137.97%
AR growth while MRVL is negative at -110.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-47.48%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MRVL at -71.48%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
121.05%
AP growth well above MRVL's 78.55%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
227.40%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MRVL's 524.71%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
83.24%
Some yoy increase while MRVL is negative at -79.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
56.45%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MRVL's 19.16%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-32.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -124.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MRVL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-76.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while MRVL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-27.79%
We reduce yoy sales while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-112.20%
We reduce yoy other investing while MRVL is 98.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-272.49%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 49.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-39.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MRVL is 18.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
39.29%
We slightly raise equity while MRVL is negative at -93.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
15.74%
We have some buyback growth while MRVL is negative at -23.02%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.