PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.45%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -22.85%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.25%
Some D&A expansion while MRVL is negative at -0.32%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-19.72%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 37.02%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.43%
SBC growth well above MRVL's 6.70%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
108.15%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -6557.89%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-134.48%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MRVL at -208.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
72.62%
Some inventory rise while MRVL is negative at -72.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
232.47%
AP growth well above MRVL's 117.18%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
96.78%
Growth well above MRVL's 144.67%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
102.42%
Well above MRVL's 31.88%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
54.47%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -46.02%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.74%
Some CapEx rise while MRVL is negative at -8.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-98.96%
Negative yoy acquisition while MRVL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
56.87%
Purchases growth of 56.87% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
18.97%
Liquidation growth of 18.97% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
175.00%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
100.00%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -13.92%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
89.93%
We repay more while MRVL is negative at -2510.96%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
281.54%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. MRVL's 605.33%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-2266.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while MRVL is 29.48%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.