PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.07%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MRVL at -139.01%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
8.21%
D&A growth well above MRVL's 5.32%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
36.36%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MRVL's 862.28%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-10.34%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MRVL at -2.02%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
738.30%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -112.84%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
194.70%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. MRVL's 1790.91%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-21.58%
Negative yoy inventory while MRVL is 11.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
569.23%
A yoy AP increase while MRVL is negative at -8700.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
7.12%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -197.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
103.13%
Some yoy increase while MRVL is negative at -17.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.36%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MRVL's 8.67%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
9.42%
Some CapEx rise while MRVL is negative at -49.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.73%
Purchases growth of 50.73% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
10542.31%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
226.08%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -39.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
90.85%
Debt repayment similar to MRVL's 94.54%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
-25.64%
Negative yoy issuance while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-68.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.