205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
43.35%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 148.70%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.25%
Negative yoy while MU is 250.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
42.40%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -52.15%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-0.40%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -60.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.29%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 47.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-47.33%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 109.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-337.54%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 65.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.68%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. MU's 2819.37%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
16.57%
Buyback growth of 16.57% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.