205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.16%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -2672.73%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
4.09%
Some D&A expansion while MU is negative at -5.41%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
600.00%
Well above MU's 25.44% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.53%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 13.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth well above MU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
16.46%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -452.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with MU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-2988.89%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -99.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.75%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -9.44%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
11.22%
CapEx growth well above MU's 20.22%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above MU's 117.73%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-14.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -23.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
13.68%
Below 50% of MU's 297.96%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 165.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
7.96%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MU's 73.79%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
64.29%
We slightly raise equity while MU is negative at -197.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
34.30%
Buyback growth below 50% of MU's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.