205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
52.55%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -23.89%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.55%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 1.12%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-370.27%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.87%
Well above MU's 36.80% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
1333.33%
Inventory growth well above MU's 62.81%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
67.36%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -18.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
1125.00%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -187.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
58.13%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 5.83%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
7.22%
CapEx growth well above MU's 13.41%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.02%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -7.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-1.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -3.93%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-130.95%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 5.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
348.32%
We expand invests by 348.32% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
103.51%
Stock issuance far above MU's 25.81%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
13.46%
Buyback growth of 13.46% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.