205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.69%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 45.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-34.71%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -3.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
61.29%
Deferred tax of 61.29% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-378.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 234.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.43%
Inventory growth well above MU's 61.41%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 70.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
23.08%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MU's 140.86%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-38.66%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 39.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-17.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -87.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-17600.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -37.21%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
57.02%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -14.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
23.51%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 10.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.54%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -176.54%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -1.80%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-65.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.