PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
308.03%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 208.95%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-1.58%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -3.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-13.89%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-34.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 550.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-56.14%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -103.48%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-804.76%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 1431.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2998.00%
Negative yoy while MU is 300.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
14.72%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MU's 106.91%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
8.33%
Lower CapEx growth vs. MU's 30.67%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
84.18%
Acquisition spending well above MU's 114.81%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-165.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -66.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-15.46%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -11.43%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
49700.00%
Growth well above MU's 427.85%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
146.91%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -116.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
11.58%
Debt repayment growth of 11.58% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-3.52%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 4818.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
27.99%
Buyback growth of 27.99% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.