PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-70.63%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -54.34%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-1.29%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 17.01%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-12.20%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 58.62%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.03%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -111.69%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.28%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -225.81%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -109.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
102.19%
Well above MU's 23.68%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-34.43%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -56.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
26.20%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -79.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. MU's 2781.03%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
56.46%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -2.65%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
30.23%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 8.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -140.54%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-34.55%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 32.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-35.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -154.56%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-63.45%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.