205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.71%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -27.86%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-6.51%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 1.06%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-67.39%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.78%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -114.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.62%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -770.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
121.14%
Growth well above MU's 72.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-617.65%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -56.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
101.67%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -13.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
22.46%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -71.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.40%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -21.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-41.55%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 40.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -132.50%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 51.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
33.33%
Buyback growth of 33.33% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.