205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.71%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 29.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-36.15%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 6.76%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-88.89%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.31%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 21.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.12%
Inventory growth well above MU's 33.33%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.60%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 5.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1215.38%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -120.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-7.05%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 87.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-19.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -12.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1300.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 196.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
58.67%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -6.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
50.15%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -86.93%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -159.09%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
259.57%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -176.10%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.64%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 180.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-33.29%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.