205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.75%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 69.66%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.62%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -4.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-7.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-6.52%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
56.25%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -80.43%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
183.87%
AR growth of 183.87% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-62.26%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 67.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-140.58%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -140.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
255.56%
Well above MU's 237.04%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
20.02%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MU's 136.42%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-92.92%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 23.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.01%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MU's 200.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
300.00%
Liquidation growth of 300.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.47%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MU's 111.11%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.76%
Issuance growth of 11.76% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-40.24%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.