PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.87%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 87.62%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.79%
Some D&A expansion while MU is negative at -1.02%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
36.36%
Well above MU's 43.59% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
4.26%
SBC growth while MU is negative at -29.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-129.33%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 82.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
25.10%
AR growth of 25.10% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
1.35%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 27.12%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-233.33%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-97.81%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 92.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.85%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 146.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-29.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -50.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
43.04%
Liquidation growth of 43.04% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
500.00%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -852.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MU's 19.29%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.81%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.