PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.70%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 153.30%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.75%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 2.26%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-285.71%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-4.08%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -9.09%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
148.85%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -123.88%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
84.57%
AR growth of 84.57% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
9.59%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 132.56%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
8100.00%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -583.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.52%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 10.57%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-39.93%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -22.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.63%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MU's 112.21%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-64.00%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-424.51%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 118.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.00%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
20.00%
Buyback growth of 20.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.