205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.66%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -62.60%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.25%
D&A growth well above MU's 6.84%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-429.63%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 106.92%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.31%
Less working capital growth vs. MU's 163.33%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
917.24%
AR growth of 917.24% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-37.88%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -335.71%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.76%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 178.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-633.33%
Negative yoy while MU is 326.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-6.68%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 21.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
23.99%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -204.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-137.29%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-16.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -1323.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
12.63%
Liquidation growth of 12.63% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.22%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -620.45%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
600.00%
Issuance growth of 600.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.