205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-29.30%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -52.09%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.94%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -2.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
121.68%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MU's 372.41%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
21.28%
SBC growth while MU is negative at -5.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-268.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -224.21%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-118.57%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-73.63%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -287.88%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-239.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -92.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
100.00%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -88.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-58.05%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -32.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
35.55%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -34.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while MU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-24.54%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
153.36%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 151.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
111.50%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -90.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.95%
We slightly raise equity while MU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-28.50%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.