PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.57%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 2.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.04%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -94.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
75.47%
SBC growth of 75.47% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
173.20%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -112.66%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
121.57%
AR growth of 121.57% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
126.19%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -119.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
260.95%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -42.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-105.88%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -442.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
80.35%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -27.19%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
30.07%
CapEx growth well above MU's 31.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.13%
Purchases growth of 5.13% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
199.82%
Liquidation growth of 199.82% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-762.87%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 83.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
65.68%
We repay more while MU is negative at -84.75%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-81.67%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
0.44%
Buyback growth of 0.44% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.