205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-50.42%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -274.03%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
46.90%
D&A growth well above MU's 1.46%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-1933.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 1075.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-29.03%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
98.12%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -690.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
972.73%
AR growth of 972.73% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
822.73%
Inventory growth well above MU's 91.95%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -213.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-3600.00%
Negative yoy while MU is 165.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-14.67%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -39.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
20.73%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -76.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.61%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 18.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-76.77%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -87.03%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
78.76%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -518.66%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
83.33%
Debt repayment similar to MU's 76.76%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
284.85%
Issuance growth of 284.85% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
33.33%
Buyback growth of 33.33% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.