PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
68.30%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -50.80%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.61%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
625.00%
Deferred tax of 625.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-7.25%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-10.48%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 420.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-339.68%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
64.84%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 194.12%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-251.35%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
155.86%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MU's 536.36%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.33%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 42.08%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-41.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 43.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-70.78%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
43.18%
Liquidation growth of 43.18% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -352.94%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
18.89%
Investing outflow well above MU's 34.31%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-91.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 95.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-73.75%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.