PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
75.78%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -13.48%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
466.67%
Deferred tax of 466.67% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-221.88%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -30.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
110.78%
Well above MU's 107.50% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
111.92%
AR growth of 111.92% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
215.63%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 1043.75%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
3.85%
AP growth of 3.85% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
17.28%
Growth well above MU's 3.47%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-48.98%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -101.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
78.07%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 19.51%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-2.74%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 29.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-257.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-78.12%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-548.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -69.94%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
13.04%
We repay more while MU is negative at -1175.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-7.35%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.