PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-66.33%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 24.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.06%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -8.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-160.50%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
182.05%
SBC growth while MU is negative at -23.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
2892.00%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -48.19%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
2016.67%
AR growth of 2016.67% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
145.95%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -58.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
277.60%
AP growth of 277.60% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-43.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -35.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1044.00%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -362.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-9.73%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -34.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
36.00%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -19.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.46%
Purchases well above MU's 86.64%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
194.30%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 37.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.88%
Investing outflow well above MU's 58.34%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
111.11%
Issuance growth of 111.11% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.