205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
82.32%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -3.27%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.24%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -0.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-460.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.08%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -386.67%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-42.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -203.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-135.09%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 303.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
85.25%
AP growth of 85.25% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
9.62%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -1331.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-50.00%
Negative yoy while MU is 226.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
87.22%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -0.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-15.48%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 24.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-248.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 64.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
264.42%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -18.35%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-638.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 162.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
1309.09%
Investing outflow well above MU's 43.66%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.45%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-6.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -50.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.