PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 115.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.96%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 3.30%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
155.56%
Deferred tax of 155.56% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-5.33%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
131.94%
Well above MU's 75.80% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
81.25%
AR growth while MU is negative at -174.26%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
70.00%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -79.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
52.78%
AP growth of 52.78% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
261.70%
Growth well above MU's 76.47%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
833.33%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -34.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
70.77%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MU's 166.67%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-27.84%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 37.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
27.84%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. MU's 86.10%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
58.49%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -218.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-69.92%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 368.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-24.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -92.02%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-168.39%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 52.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x MU's 85.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
1.75%
Issuance growth of 1.75% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-1.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.