PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -77.72%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.08%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 48.63%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-171.15%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
18.18%
SBC growth while MU is negative at -26.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-214.16%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 12600.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-146.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -282.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
440.00%
Inventory growth well above MU's 322.22%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-1000.00%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-1161.54%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 485.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
117.19%
Well above MU's 121.66%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-61.47%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 110.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
28.04%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -87.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -50.72%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-43.97%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 49.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
14.60%
Below 50% of MU's 80.00%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
148.72%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MU's 1708.82%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-147.97%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 103.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.45%
Issuance growth of 68.45% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
1.91%
Buyback growth of 1.91% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.